Know what your AI is actually delivering
See if your AI is paying off — and fix what isn't.
AIReturn measures what your teams and AI agents actually produce, the rework they waste, and the return on every AI dollar — across engineering, product, support and sales — so you know where to spend more and what to fix.
Return on AI
Last 90 days3.1×
return on AI spend
AI under management
$1.2M
Wasted on rework
$140K
Recoverable
$92K
Companies are pouring money into AI. Almost no one can prove it's working.
Only28%
of AI use cases hit their ROI target
— Gartner
74% → 20%
expected AI to grow revenue vs. those who saw it
— Deloitte
78%
of finance leaders can't tie AI spend to outcomes
— CloudZero
What “return on AI” actually means
Your AI ROI, in one picture.
The 3.1× above isn’t a black box. Here’s exactly what it’s made of — in plain language, and every piece links to where you see it in the product.
See the full methodology
Click a box or lever above to change this panel
For the board
Your return on AI, in one number.
Value delivered vs. AI spend, team by team, rolled into one honest number for the board.
Return on AI
Last 90 days3.1×
return on AI spend
AI under management
$1.2M
Wasted on rework
$140K
Recoverable
$92K
For the AI leader
A map of who’s efficient and who’s burning.
Every team plotted by AI cost per result against rework — green pays off, red burns. Each team is measured against its own history, never ranked against another.
Cost vs Rework
By team · Last 90 daysEach team is measured against its own history — never ranked against another team.
For team leads
A prioritized list of what to fix.
For the teams and agents driving rework, the top moves to fix it — ranked by impact and effort. Apply one, and the trend confirms whether it worked.
- 01
Show the AI examples of great work — solved tickets, won deals, merged changes
Impact: HighEffort: LowFor: Tier 1, Mid-market, Payments
- 02
Name an owner for how your AI is set up
Impact: HighEffort: Low - 03
Match the AI's instructions to how the team actually works
Impact: MediumEffort: Low
For the CFO
A budget decision, not another dashboard.
Each team’s AI spend against the budget you set, with a call you can act on: raise, hold, or review. Defend every AI dollar with what the work actually shows.
AI budget
This month| Team | AI spend/mo | Budget | vs budget | Marginal return / $ | Call |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform (Engineering) | $92K | $85K | +8% over | $1.82 | Raise |
| Payments (Engineering) | $118K | $95K | +24% over | $0.34 | Review |
| Tier 1 (Support) | $64K | $65K | on budget | $1.08 | Hold |
| Mid-market (Sales) | $71K | $60K | +18% over | $0.52 | Review |
Apply all → $31K/mo shifts toward teams where AI pays off.
How it’s built
Built on a model of how your company actually works.
AIReturn maps your teams, their people, and the tools each works in — including AI — and learns each team’s work cycle. Set up once; kept current automatically.
How it works
Low lift, fast payoff. Setup is a conversation, not a rollout project — you’re seeing your return in weeks.
Which areas do you want to onboard?
01 Connect — in an afternoon.
Tell an agent which areas to onboard, drop in your org chart — a screenshot works — and connect your tools, read-only. A conversation, not a rollout project.
02 Measure — against your own history, in weeks.
We measure what each team produces, the rework it took, and what the AI cost — each team compared only to its own baseline, never ranked against another team.
Give support AI examples of your best resolved tickets
Name an owner for your AI setup
03 Act — on a decision, not a dashboard.
See where AI pays off, where it burns, and the exact next fix — then watch the trend confirm it worked.
Everyone measures the inputs. AIReturn measures whether it worked.
| AI cost | Model quality | Compliance | Did the work get better? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI cost / FinOps tools | AI cost / FinOps tools: AI cost — yes | AI cost / FinOps tools: Model quality — no | AI cost / FinOps tools: Compliance — no | AI cost / FinOps tools: Did the work get better? — no |
| AI observability / monitoring | AI observability / monitoring: AI cost — no | AI observability / monitoring: Model quality — yes | AI observability / monitoring: Compliance — no | AI observability / monitoring: Did the work get better? — no |
| AI governance tools | AI governance tools: AI cost — no | AI governance tools: Model quality — no | AI governance tools: Compliance — yes | AI governance tools: Did the work get better? — no |
| AIReturn | AIReturn: AI cost — yes | AIReturn: Model quality — no | AIReturn: Compliance — no | AIReturn: Did the work get better? — yes |
AI cost / FinOps tools
- AI cost
- Model quality
- Compliance
- Did the work get better?
AI observability / monitoring
- AI cost
- Model quality
- Compliance
- Did the work get better?
AI governance tools
- AI cost
- Model quality
- Compliance
- Did the work get better?
AIReturn
- AI cost
- Model quality
- Compliance
- Did the work get better?
…and the only one that measures it across every team — not just engineering.
Connects to your stack
Reads the work where it happens.
Code, tickets, deals, product — AIReturn connects to the tools your teams already use. Read-only.
- Read-only connections — we never write to your systems
- Work items and activity logs only — never your documents, code, or conversations
- Team-level, never individual — no scoreboards, no team-vs-team rankings
What changes for you
Defend your AI budget to the board with a real number.
Cut the rework quietly burning your AI spend.
Double down on the teams where AI actually pays off.
Priced to your results, not your headcount.
Pricing depends on your AI spend — you pay a small fraction of what you put under management, so our price only grows when your AI investment does. No per-seat games.
Stop guessing whether your AI is worth it.
Get a clear return-on-AI picture in weeks.